< Previous Issue

February 2007 Issue - Volume 3, Number 1

Society-Logo-Bar-2021-1024x55

Zircon - Tiny but Timely

Simon L. Harley and Nigel M. Kelly – Guest Editors

Table of Contents

Thematic Articles

By ,
Where would Earth science be without zircon? Tiny crystals of zircon occur in many rocks, and because their atomic structure remains stable over very long periods of geological time, they are able to provide a picture of the early history of the Earth and of the evolution of the crust and mantle. Zircon has long been recognized as the best geochronometer using the radioactive decay of uranium to lead. Recent developments in analytical techniques, using small-diameter laser, ion and electron beams, high-precision mass spectrometry and a variety of microscopic imaging methods, allow us to obtain the ages of tiny volumes of complex crystals that record stages in their long growth history. Coupled measurements of the isotopes of oxygen and hafnium provide a mineralogical window into the separation of the Earth’s crust from the mantle and the temperature and character of processes involved in crustal evolution. Zircon is being used to unravel ever more complex geological systems, presenting exciting opportunities for research on this remarkable mineral.
By , ,
Zircon has long played a key role in crustal evolution studies as the preeminent U–Pb geochronometer. Recent advances in analytical capabilities now permit investigations of complex grains at high spatial resolution, where the goal is to link zircon ages to other petrographic and geochemical information. Zircon can provide time-stamped ‘snapshots’ of hafnium and oxygen isotope signatures of magmas throughout Earth’s history, even at the scale of individual growth zones within a single grain. This information is an invaluable help to geochemists trying to distinguish magmatic events that added new, mantle-derived material to the continental crust from those that merely recycled existing crust.
By , ,
Using the U–Pb geochronology of zircon we can understand the growth and collapse of mountain chains, both recent and ancient. In the hightemperature metamorphic rocks that underlie mountain ranges, zircon may survive from precursor rocks, recrystallize, or grow anew. All these possibilities must be considered in the interpretation of zircon ages. Microtextural characterisation and microanalysis, coupled with considerations of mineral equilibria and trace element distributions between zircon and neighbouring silicate minerals, provide insights into the factors controlling zircon modification and growth. Zircon ages do not usually correspond to the peak of metamorphism but instead provide information on the history of cooling from high temperatures, including the timing and rates of exhumation of the deep roots of mountain chains.
By ,
Zircon is of fundamental importance in the investigation of deeply subducted crustal rocks in which it is a trace constituent. Tiny mineral inclusions within zircon may be the only indicators that rocks were subducted to a depth of up to 150 km. Because zircon is resistant to physical and chemical changes, it preserves stages of the subduction and exhumation history within submillimetre-size grains. Advanced in situ techniques allow us to date zircon domains and to determine their trace element composition. We can thus acquire a detailed knowledge of the temperature–pressure–time paths that these extraordinary rocks have experienced. Zircon studies provide evidence that subduction and exhumation act at plate tectonic speeds of 1–3 cm/year.
By ,
Natural zircon crystals incorporate rare earth elements (REE) into their structure at concentrations determined by the pressure, temperature, and composition of their growth environment. In principle, REE concentrations in magmatic zircon crystals can be used to infer their conditions of growth and the composition of the melt from which they grew—provided accurate information is available about the distribution of REE between zircon and melt. Currently available zircon–melt partitioning data show a range in values covering several orders of magnitude for some REE. Further experimental work and studies using carefully selected natural samples are required to fully understand REE incorporation in zircon.
By , ,
Natural zircon crystals often show complex secondary textures that cut across primary growth zones. In zircon showing structural damage caused by self-irradiation, such textures are the result of a diffusion– reaction process in which a hydrous species diffuses inwards and “catalyzes” structural recovery. Nanoscale pores develop, solvent elements such as Ca, Al and Fe are gained, and radiogenic Pb is lost. In both aqueous fluids and melts, replacement of zircon with undamaged structure by a coupled dissolution– reprecipitation process can produce similar textures. The reacted domains usually have lower trace element contents and may contain micrometer-sized pores and inclusions of uranium, thorium and/or yttrium phases, originally in solid solution. Both processes have considerable implications for zircon geochronology.
By
Numerous cases have been reported where zircon may have precipitated from a hydrothermal fluid or a fluid-saturated residual melt. Temperatures for hydrothermal zircon formation range from 600°C in late-magmatic systems at the magmatic-to-hydrothermal transition down to 300°C in mesothermal ore-forming systems. Late-magmatic to hydrothermal zircon may precipitate from fluid-saturated magma and possibly from the fluids exsolved from mineralized granites and pegmatites. For example, in the Sn–Wmineralized Mole Granite, New South Wales, Australia, zircon occurs in growth zones in hydrothermal quartz, along with monazite, xenotime and thorite
Scroll to Top